A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a “C singing practice room” on the B building and the fourth floor when the game is in harmony.

1. No one shall, for the purpose of making a profit, drink alcoholic beverages with customers, provide entertainment to customers by singing or dancing, or arrange any other person to provide entertainment services;

Nevertheless, on January 9, 2019, the Defendant: (a) received 60,000 won per hour from two customers, such as D, etc. to receive 60,000 won per hour under the pretext of providing entertainment loans and providing services; and (b) introduced two female contact loans to the said customers, thereby allowing the said customer to drink together with the said customer, drink and dance with the said customer; and (c) arranged the loan.

2. Any karaoke machine business operator who sells alcoholic beverages shall be prohibited from selling or providing any alcoholic beverage;

Nevertheless, the defendant sold 4 can cans equivalent to 16,00 won at the market price of alcoholic beverages to 2 customers, such as the date and time mentioned in Paragraph 1, D, etc. to be customers at the place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of statutes on field video CDs;

1. Article 34 (4) and Article 22 (2) of the Music Industry Promotion Act (the point of arranging entertainment activities), Articles 34 (3) and 22 (1) 3 of the Music Industry Promotion Act (the point of selling alcoholic beverages), the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the suspension of execution, taking into account the following: (a) the Defendant’s reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act committed a crime of the same kind, even if having been already punished several times for the same offense; and (b) the Defendant’s miscompetence of the sentence;