1. The plaintiff (appointed)'s claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the plaintiff (appointed party).

1. Upon the Defendant’s recommendation that the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties invested in the business called “H”, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) returned the principal within one year and paid ten times the investment amount as profits, respectively, invested the amount stated in the purport of the claim to the Defendant around October 2018.

The defendant is obligated to pay the amount stated in the purport of the claim to the plaintiff (appointed party) and the appointed party according to an agreement to return the principal.

2. According to the evidence No. 1-7 of the judgment No. 1-7, the fact that the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties remitted the amount claimed to the Defendant in October 2018 is recognized.

However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the fact that an investment agreement was concluded between the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Defendant as alleged above, and the Plaintiff (Appointed Party)’s assertion on this premise is without merit.

3. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s claim is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.