logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2018.02.21 2015가단25749
주위토지통행권확인 등
Text

For the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant),

A. (1) The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff, the appointed party), B, E, Defendant C, and D are on the front week.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff's main lawsuit against the defendant (appointed party) and the judgment as to the plaintiff's counterclaim against the defendant (Appointed party)

A. The land subject to recognition is each land owned by the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff-owned land”) and the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff-owned land”) of 729 square meters in Yansan-gu, Yandong-gu, Yan-gu

B. F. F. F. F. 63/158 square meters, E. 62/158 shares, the deceased L.’s inheritors less than 33/158 shares, and in order, “each of the instant land” and “the instant land No. 1, 2, and 3”

B. The owners of each land indicated in the separate sheet E 40/145 square meters, E 40/145 square meters designated in G 145 square meters (designated parties) are as follows: (i) the owners of each land indicated in the separate sheet E 43/212 square meters, E 169/212 square meters designated in G 145 square meters; (ii) the owners of each land of this case, including the Defendant (appointed parties) and the designated parties, are entering N in the order of each land listed in paragraph (1) of this case (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) and adjacent M 535 square meters of land (hereinafter referred to as “the instant bridge”).

3) Each land owned by the Plaintiff was not abutting on a public road. Use of the instant road and the instant bridge is the highest length leading to the contribution, and O and P, the former owner of the instant road, entered the instant road and the instant bridge as a passage to the public road, and there is no other passage leading to the present contribution. 4) However, the Appointer H brought about marina and waste materials on the third part of the instant land, thereby obstructing the Plaintiff’s passage, and the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties brought about a mobile brid on the side of the instant road while disputing the Plaintiff’s right to passage over surrounding land.

[Reasons for Recognition] A. A. Each entry or image of the evidence of No. 11 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) without dispute, and this Court.

arrow