logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2018.10.17 2017고단1072
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

On July 10, 2015, one of the the facts charged in the instant case is not guilty of fraud.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] On March 22, 2012, the Incheon District Court sentenced the Defendant to four months of imprisonment with prison labor and one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the original prison on January 28, 2013, and completed the execution of the sentence on January 6, 2017. The Seoul Southern District Court sentenced the Defendant to one year and four months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Southern District Court on March 29, 2018, and sentenced the Defendant to one year and four months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud, etc. on March 29, 2018.

[2017 Highest 1072]

1. On February 29, 2016, the Defendant against the victim E, at the office of “D” with the third floor of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul, for the extension of the domestic period of stay of foreigners of children,” the victim E, who found the extension of the domestic period of stay of foreigners, changed the amount of KRW 3 million. If he/she fails to perform his/her duties, he/she shall return the full amount.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the Defendant had never been able to deal with immigration-related affairs, such as administrative history, etc., and there was no particular ability to allow foreigners who are disqualified for his/her stay to extend his/her visa. On the other hand, as bad credit holders did not have any special property or income, the Defendant was found to have received money and valuables from foreigners on the condition of extending his/her visa, etc. and did not have any intent or ability to return the money and valuables received if he/she cannot engage in the entrusted affairs after receiving money and valuables from foreigners.

The Defendant, as above, was delivered KRW 1 million on the same day as the consideration for the extension of the visa by deceiving the victim, and KRW 2 million on March 6, 2016 by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

[2017 Highest 5870]

2. On April 1, 2015, the Defendant for fraud against five victims: “A victim B who wishes to obtain the nationality of the Republic of Korea in the said D Office shall obtain the nationality of the Republic of Korea.” This is six million won.

arrow