Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and two months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of ten months.

Criminal facts

[Defendant A's criminal records] On October 28, 201, the Seoul High Court sentenced Defendant A to one year and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Embry for known players). On August 10, 2012, the Daejeon District Court sentenced Defendant A to three months of imprisonment for forgery of private documents, etc., and completed the execution of the last sentence in Daejeon District Court on January 8, 2013.

[2] The Defendants: (a) obtained an export credit guarantee from the Korea Trade Insurance Corporation to submit the said bank a guarantee to obtain a loan under the pretext that the Defendants were engaged in overseas export by using the so-called “documents-based company (spaferer)” whose sales performance was fabricated with false financial statements, etc. although they did not have the intent or ability to export goods to a foreign country; and (b) obtained an export credit guarantee from the Korea

Accordingly, the Defendants want to pay more than 10% of the loan out of the amount of the loan by borrowing the name of the company necessary to obtain the export credit guarantee certificate from the Korea Trade Insurance Corporation to G, the actual private company of the above company, and H, etc., which is the representative director of the Puercom, from the victim, after obtaining the export credit guarantee certificate from the Korea Trade Insurance Corporation.

The proposal obtained the consent of G, H, etc.

In such a situation, around July 10, 2014, the Defendants filed an application with the employee in charge of the above Corporation for the issuance of export credit guarantee equivalent to US$ 100,000,000 as the shipping of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the shipment of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the goods in receipt of the goods.

However, in fact, the Defendants filed an application for the issuance of export credit guarantee certificate with the submission of false and fabricated financial statements, etc. by lending the name of the (State) F, which is merely a compliance. After receiving the export credit guarantee certificate, the Defendants submitted the said guarantee certificate to the bank and received money.