A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On February 14, 2013, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 5 million to the Ulsan District Court for a violation of road traffic law (driving), and on June 24, 2013, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a violation of road traffic law (driving), respectively.

[2] The Defendant, as above, driven a motor vehicle with two or more times of drinking alcohol driving skills, with approximately two hundred meters of alcohol level 0.092% under the influence of alcohol level 0.092% in blood, from the upper end of the upper end of the road in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Busan-do, on October 24, 2016 to the road in front of the luxle-gu, Ulsan-do.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of an inquiry letter, investigation report, and summary order-making statute, such as criminal history;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) (Selection of Imprisonment) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act include the number of times and time when the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime, the number of alcohol concentration in blood at the time of driving the drinking of this case, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, intelligence and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the various reasons for sentencing as shown in the argument of this case, such as the defendant's age