The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (six months of imprisonment) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is recognized that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects the fact that he should support the defendant, and his wife and his daughters are married. On the other hand, even though the defendant was punished for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2012 and several times of criminal records of the same kind, such as the defendant was sentenced to the punishment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in 2012, the defendant re-driving the motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol level of 0.162 percent during the period of repeated crime; the court below also sentenced a punishment less than the minimum statutory punishment (one year of imprisonment) by reducing the amount considering the above circumstances favorable to the defendant; taking account of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, the circumstances surrounding the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, etc., it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable since the defendant's above assertion is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.