A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) sent to the site by a 112-reported taxi engineer who provides passengers with a bath on the front side of the 1622-Yancheon-gun, Yancheon-gun, Yancheon-gun, Yancheon-gun, Yancheon-gun, Yancheon-do, on November 26, 2016; and (b) dispatched to the site and ascertaining the circumstances of the instant case.

어라 눈을 동그랗게 뜨면 어쩔 건데 ”라고 욕설을 하면서 오른손으로 위 C의 목 부위를 잡고 밀어 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in written statements prepared D;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution;

3. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for community service work.

1. The scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines [the types of decisions] and the scope of the punishment [the scope of the recommended punishment [the scope of the punishment [the scope of the recommendation], the mitigated area, and the imprisonment for not more than eight months, where the degree of violence, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or interference with public duties is insignificant;

2. The crime of obstructing the performance of official duties, such as this case, is a crime that undermines the functions of the State by nullifying the legitimate exercise of public authority, and thus, requires strict punishment to establish a national legal order and eradicate the light of public authority.

There is also a record that the defendant has been punished for the same crime, and has been punished as suspension of execution and a large number of fines due to violent crimes.

On the other hand, on the other hand, it was hard to say that the degree of assault itself was relatively unhutiled because the defendant was booming the part of the damaged police officer.

I seem to appear.

The defendant was found to have committed the crime of this case due to the fact that he lost his ability to refrain from drinking, and the crime of this case was committed, and his mistake was committed.

imprisonment with prison labor of 2010.