logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.12.21 2016고단3056
사기방조등
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

Around January 28, 2016, the summary of the facts charged is that “The Defendant is unable to obtain credit due to lack of credit, and loans must be made after setting credit by setting up transaction performance. To grant a loan, he/she is required to set up transaction performance and then borrowed KRW 5 million by drawing up transaction performance if he/she sent the passbook.” The Defendant was urged to receive money, even though the Defendant suspected that he/she is an employee of the Bophishing Fraudulent Group, he/she was suspected of having been an employee of the Bophishing Fraudulent Group.

1. In using and managing a means of access, no person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act shall borrow or lend a means of access, or keep, deliver or distribute a means of access while demanding, demanding or promising the use of or managing a means of access unless otherwise expressly provided for in other Acts;

On January 28, 2016, the Defendant, within the office of Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, under the circumstances where the Defendant was unable to obtain a loan due to low credit, he/she obtained a loan by accumulating transaction records as above, and issued Kwikkset Card and password connected to the Defendant’s name D (E) through Kwikset Service.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to obtain intangible expectation interest that can be received future loans through the details of transactions of deposit and withdrawal to lend the means of access to a person who is not his/her name.

2. On February 1, 2016, an employee in charge of the fraud of the above fraud was transferred 579,000 won from the victim’s account in the name of the Defendant around February 3, 2016, on the ground that: (a) the fact was merely a refund of the singish fraud; (b) the fact was not an intention or ability to provide a loan; and (c) the victim F by telephone to the account of the victim “a microcredit is an employee of the G Bank. In order to obtain a loan, necessary expenses and fees for credit rating are required to be deposited; and (d) the said employee was transferred 579,000 won from the victim’s account in the name of the Defendant around 09.

The defendant is used in the licensing fraud as above.

arrow