1. On January 14, 2013, the information provided by the Defendant against the Plaintiff on the list of documents subject to the request for information disclosure set forth in attached Table 1.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 21, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a claim with the Defendant for the disclosure of information on the Defendant’s materials and minutes of the Defendant’s 74th and 75th meetings related to the promotion of normalization of school juristic persons B (hereinafter “B”), and ② other related conference materials and minutes of the meeting (the type and title of a specific document in the process of the hearing of the Korean court are as indicated in the attached Form; hereinafter the above 1 and 2, collectively referred to as “information of this case”).

B. On January 14, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision not to disclose the instant information to the Plaintiff that it constitutes Article 9(1)5 and 6 of the former Official Information Disclosure Act (amended by Act No. 11991, Aug. 6, 2013; hereinafter “Act”) (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1, result of non-disclosure inspection conducted by the Korean court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the instant information does not constitute information subject to non-disclosure, while the instant disposition is unlawful, the Defendant asserts that the instant information constitutes information subject to non-disclosure under Article 9(1)5 and 6 of the Act, and thus, the instant disposition is lawful.

B. The details of the relevant statutes are as shown in Appendix 2 of the relevant statutes.

다. 판단 (1) 이 사건 정보가 법 제9조 제1항 제5호 소정의 비공개대상정보에 해당하는지 ㈎ 법 제9조 제1항 제5호에서 규정하고 있는 '공개될 경우 업무의 공정한 수행에 현저한 지장을 초래한다고 인정할 만한 상당한 이유가 있는 경우'라 함은 법 제1조에서 천명한 정보공개제도의 목적 및 법 제9조 제1항 제5호의 입법 취지에 비추어 볼 때 공개할 경우 업무의 공정한 수행이 객관적으로 현저하게 지장을 받으리라는 고도의 개연성이 존재하는 경우를 의미하고, 이에...