The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the sentence of the lower court against the Defendant (one month of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Taking into account and examining various circumstances, including the fact that the act of selling fake petroleum does harm the distribution order of petroleum products and harm the public safety and the environment, and that there is a serious need to punish the defendant severely, that there is a history of punishment for the same kind of crime, that the defendant was found to have committed the crime of Paragraph 2 at the time of original adjudication, even though the defendant was found to have committed the crime of Paragraph 1 at the time of original adjudication, and the fact that the defendant was found to have committed the crime of Paragraph 2 at the time of original adjudication only for one month, and that the defendant cannot expect the effect of preventing recidivism any further, the defendant's age, character, occupation, occupation, and environment, and that the sentence of the court below seems to be appropriate. Thus, the defendant's assertion

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.