The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the penalty (4 million won of a fine) imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Although the judgment of the court below is against the defendant's wrong recognition, the defendant's primary crime without the criminal records, and the "D Research Institute" was operated as E and Dong business, the above research institute stated E as a clinical psychologist belonging to the above research institute to register as an institution providing psychological support services for parents growth, and the defendant stated F as a counseling examiner belonging to the above research institute, and submitted an application for registration to Nowon-gu. Since the complainant is demanded and urged the public official in Nowon-gu to submit an employment contract, etc. of the complainant in the situation where the complainant is no longer working at the above research institute, the defendant's official in charge of Nowon-gu to demand and urge the complainant to submit an employment contract, etc. of the complainant. Thus, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case. However, considering the above circumstances of the defendant, it seems that the court below already committed a fine of 4 million won reduced by the fine of 5 million won before and after the summary order, considering the defendant's aforementioned circumstances, it seems that the defendant did not have any possibility to receive the defendant's individual trust and trust in each of the defendant's each of this case.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.