logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.09.08 2016고단2682
자동차손해배상보장법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On June 16, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years on October 24, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 24, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On June 22, 2016, the Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act: (a) operated the said cargo vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance, on the road front of the E cafeteria located D at Silung-si around 18:40 on June 22, 2016.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) has driven the said cargo vehicle 2 km without a driver’s license from the front of the Hoban Construction Site to the front of the E-cafeteria located in Silung City at Silung-si.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Registers of mandatory insurance policies and driver's licenses;

1. The photograph of cargo vehicle;

1. Previous records of judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports, investigation reports (former records and attachment of judgment) and statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, the main sentence of Article 8, Article 152 (1) and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act dealing with concurrent crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the fact that the reason for sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act recognizes and reflects his mistake, and the crime of this case must be considered at the same time as the crime of fabrication of air defense for which the judgment in the judgment in the judgment in the judgment in the judgment in the judgment in the judgment in the judgment, etc.

However, the defendant again committed the crime of this case since he was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two weeks in October due to the crime of forging air (including the violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and the violation of the Road Traffic Act) as stated in the judgment of the defendant (including the violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and the violation of the Road Traffic Act) and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two weeks, and three times as a crime of violating the Road Traffic

arrow