1. The Defendant’s KRW 1,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from January 6, 2014 to April 8, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

(a) The following facts of recognition may be found either in dispute between the parties or in the entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, together with the whole purport of the pleadings:

1) On January 6, 2014, around 04:00, the Defendant and C expressed desire to the Plaintiff, on the ground that C and the Plaintiff were able to go against each other on the front of the road located in Ansan-gu, Mayang-gu, Mayang-si on the ground that the B and the Plaintiff were able to go against each other, and the Defendant expressed a desire to the Plaintiff, and made an assault, such as taking the Plaintiff’s face on one occasion at the right side of the Plaintiff’s drinking (hereinafter “the first assault”).

(1) After the first assault, C and the Defendant were assaulted by the Plaintiff, who left the place of residence and left the place of residence and left the place of residence in order to take the Plaintiff’s face at the time of drinking to the Plaintiff by drinking the Plaintiff’s face, following the second assault, etc. (hereinafter “second assault”).

(2) The Plaintiff, due to the above assault 2, sustained injury, such as internal and internal walls, and pelkes, etc. (hereinafter “the instant injury”) requiring treatment for about 36 days.

)를 당하였다. 2) 그 후 군복무 중이던 C과 피고는 폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)죄로 기소되었으나, 제51보병사단 보통군사법원은 2014. 7. 30. 검찰의 공소사실 중 제1 폭행 당시 피고가 주먹으로 원고의 오른쪽 눈 부분을 3회 때리고 발로 원고의 다리를 2회 걷어찼으며 제2 폭행 당시 피고가 원고를 발로 찼다는 부분을 배척한 후, 피고가 C의 제2 폭행에 가담하였다는 사실을 인정할 수 없고 피고의 제1 폭행과 원고의 상해 사이에 인과관계를 인정할 수 없다는 이유로 피고에 대하여 폭행죄(제1 폭행), C에 대하여 상해죄(제2 폭행) 등 도로교통법위반(사고후미조치), 자동차불법사용, 폭행, 도로교통법위반, 도로교통법위반(무면허운전) 등 만을...