1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiffs each amount of KRW 20,250,000 and each of the said amounts to the day of full payment from May 31, 2014 to the day of full payment.

(1) Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire arguments as to evidence Gap's evidence Nos. 1 and 5, the deceased D (hereinafter "the deceased") leased KRW 65,00,000 to the defendant at the time of purchasing Goyang-gu E apartment 901, 207, Goyang-gu, Goyang-si around 2008, and leased KRW 40,000 in relation to the defendant's operation of Goyang-si. The defendant sold the above apartment around September 201, and repaid KRW 24,00,000 to the defendant. The deceased died on June 201, the deceased's husband and children, and the defendant and G were succeeded to the property of the deceased, and the above FF also died, barring any special circumstance, the defendant is obligated to pay 20,500,000 won to the plaintiffs in proportion to their shares in inheritance 】 20,50,400,000 won per annum 50,400.

(2) As to this, the Defendant paid KRW 17,00,000 to the Defendant for the amount invested by the Deceased at the time of purchase of Goyang-gu E apartment 901, 207, Goyang-gu, Yangyang-gu, Yangyang-si, and KRW 24,00,000 after selling the above apartment, and paid KRW 24,00,00 to the Plaintiff for all the obligation of the Deceased. The “40,000,000,000” stated in the evidence No. 2, did not mean that the Defendant borrowed KRW 40,000 to the Deceased, but rather, it is argued that the Defendant paid KRW 40,00,000 to the Defendant for the expenses paid by the Deceased at the time of sealing the Deceased. However, the evidence submitted by the Defendant alone is insufficient to recognize this.

In addition, if the plaintiffs deducted the amount (39,759,307 won) paid by the deceased and the F for the deceased from the money (173,430,502 won) that they received from the deceased and the non-party F, the plaintiffs received more than KRW 133,671,195 from the plaintiffs.