logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.09.06 2017구합61295
주택건설사업계획 변경승인처분 취소
Text

1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the costs incurred by participation.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

B between April 24, 200 and December 26, 2001, the two parties including C and five others obtained permission from the head of the Gu, which is the jurisdiction of the defendant or the Si, from April 24, 2000 to December 26, 2001, for the total of 49,446 square meters of all 8 blocks (hereinafter “prior project site in this case”) including the land listed in the attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant land”), including the land listed in the attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant land”), with respect to the permission for each development act (hereinafter “the prior permission for the alteration of land form and quality”) listed in the attached Table 2-1 (hereinafter “the prior permission”), from June 24, 200 to June 8, 2003, the permission for the development act in the name of the permitting authority was changed to J (hereinafter “J), J (N), K (hereinafter “N, etc.”), and P (P).

(A) From July 29, 2004 to September 12, 2004, J et al. filed a 42 building report as shown in the attached Table 2-2, which newly constructs 42 buildings, including electric source housing, on the previous project site of this case (hereinafter “prior building report of this case”) with the head of the competent Si/Gu, In addition, from July 29, 2004 to September 12, 2004, the expiration date of the permission period for the development activities of this case was extended to June 30, 206.

(A) On November 24, 2015, the Defendant approved the construction project plan for the housing of 1,717 households (hereinafter “instant project”) with respect to the construction of apartment houses on the land of 84,143 square meters (hereinafter “instant project site”) out of the wife E and 15 lots of land, including the instant land, to the Defendant’s supplementary intervenor (hereinafter “the Intervenor”) and the IMA (hereinafter “MA”) on November 24, 2015, and submitted documents proving that the revocation of the instant development permit has been completed.

arrow