1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Facts of recognition

The plaintiff is a non-profit medical corporation that establishes and operates our hospital, which is a medical institution.

B was hospitalized in the above Korean Hospital for 22 days from May 22, 2013 to June 12, 2013, as the health of the elderly who was under long-term care in the sanatorium for the elderly, and was hospitalized in the above Korean Hospital for 22 days from May 22, 2013. On May 23, 2013, the Defendant, as the children of B, drafted a written pledge of hospitalization in which the Plaintiff would pay B medical expenses jointly with B.

The Plaintiff provided medical treatment, such as medication, injection, treatment operation and various tests, with respect to the symptoms of B’s “other symptoms between the detailed identification and the unknown identification, etc.”

After that, the Plaintiff claimed KRW 1,560,550 of the total amount of medical care benefit costs of KRW 2,068,90 to the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, and the remaining patient identification charges of KRW 508,350 are stated in the receipt of medical expense (Evidence A) issued by the Defendant by the Plaintiff, but the personal identification charges of KRW 51,060 are stated in the Defendant. However, according to the Plaintiff’s application for modification of the purport of the claim and the cause of the claim as of August 4, 2015, the patient identification charges are adjusted to KRW 508,350 due to correction of the unit price of the main feed and the functional test

(i) claimed KRW 1,58,550,550, total of KRW 2,068,90 - KRW 1,560,550 and non-benefit medical expenses.

On the other hand, the plaintiff designated the above "C" as a collaborative company and ordered a discount of 10% on the medical expenses for the patient at the same time.

[Ground of recognition] Fact-finding without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 12 (including each branch number in the case of additional numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings. According to the above fact-finding, the defendant is the day following the discharge of plaintiff 1,402,695 won (=1,558,550 won - 155,8555 won), which deducts 15,855 won equivalent to the total sum of 1,58,50 won of the above medical expenses, and the remaining medical expenses (i.e., 558,550 won - 15,8555 won) and the following day.