1. The Defendant did not have each resolution listed in the separate sheet No. 2, which was made at the temporary shareholders’ meeting on November 24, 2012.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) was established on October 21, 2005 with the purpose of developing solar fuel cells, solar light production, etc., and the Plaintiffs are the shareholders of the Defendant Co., Ltd., and the Intervenor joining the Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ Intervenor”) as the manager of the Defendant Co., Ltd., and the Appointed I (hereinafter “I”) as the representative director of the Defendant Co., Ltd.

B. At the time of the establishment of the Defendant Company, H was appointed as the manager of the Defendant Company on April 29, 2010. After that, the Defendant Company dismissed I from office as the representative director by a resolution of the board of directors on October 25, 2010, and appointed Nonparty J as the representative director. On February 10, 2011, I dismissed I as the director by a resolution of the general meeting of shareholders as of February 10, 201, and appointed Nonparty K, L, L, M, N, and Plaintiff E as each director. On the same day, H was dismissed from office by a resolution of the board of directors.

C. After that, the J resigned from the representative director on March 4, 201, and the Defendant Company appointed L as the representative director by a resolution of the board of directors on the same day.

H and I filed a lawsuit against the Defendant Company to nullify the resolution of a regular general meeting of shareholders (Seoul District Court 201Gahap2205). On August 11, 2011, the said court rendered a judgment dismissing some of the lawsuit and dismissing its claim.

Accordingly, H et al. appealed (Seoul High Court 201Na4567). On May 30, 2012, the above court rendered a judgment in favor of the purport that H will be dismissed from office as a director at the shareholders' general meeting on February 10, 2011, and the resolution to appoint K, L, M, N, and Plaintiff E as a director was revoked, and on the same day, the board of directors rendered a partial favorable judgment that H will confirm that the resolution is invalid.

As to this, the Defendant Company’s final appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2012Da5992), but on October 25, 2012, the final judgment dismissing the final appeal was pronounced (hereinafter “the final judgment of this case”).

E. The final judgment of this case is recognized.