The judgment of the court below and the judgment of the court below are all reversed.

As to the crimes of Nos. 1 and 2 of the judgment of the defendant, six months of imprisonment.

1. The first instance court found the Defendant guilty on the obstruction of performance of official duties, injury, or specialism, and appealed by the Defendant.

The second instance court rendered a judgment of conviction on the fraud and embezzlement against the Defendant. Accordingly, the lower court reversed the second instance judgment and sentenced the Defendant guilty on the fraud and embezzlement on the grounds that the litigation procedure of the lower court against the Defendant was in violation of the law and constitutes a case affecting the conclusion of the judgment in the case before remanding the case.

As a result of the Defendant’s final appeal, the lower court’s judgment prior to remand was reversed and remanded on the grounds that the lower court erred by violating the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Act regarding the appointment of state appointed defense counsel, and the case of appeal by the second instance judgment (hereinafter “the case of appeal”) remanded was combined with the case of appeal by the first instance judgment (hereinafter “the case of appeal”) according to the party members’ consolidated examination decision.

Therefore, both the first and second cases are subject to the scope of the judgment of this court.

2. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 사실오인 주장(사기, 횡령의 점에 대하여) 1) 피고인이 피해자 K으로부터 서울 구로구 O 일대 재개발공사 중 철거공사를 수주하는데 필요한 리베이트 자금 2,000만 원을 빌려 선정디엔씨에게 리베이트 명목으로 지급하고 주식회사 L 명의로 선정디엔씨와 철거공사도급계약을 체결하였을 뿐이고 피해자를 기망한 사실이 없음에도 이 사건 사기의 점에 대한 공소사실 부분을 유죄로 인정한 제2 원심판결에는 사실오인의 위법이 있다. 2) 피고인이 부도난 어음의 보증인으로부터 상환 받은 2,000만 원을 보관하던 중 피해자 K의 승낙을 받아 주식회사 네츄럴하모니로부터 서울 동작구 사당동 재건축연합조합의...