logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.06.20 2017고단573
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who violates the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (the award) and violates the Road Traffic Act (the non-measures after the accident).

On February 10, 2017, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol 0.117% during blood transfusions on February 10, 2017, and led to the two-lane road in front of the Yansan-gu C, Jeonju-si, with the two-lane road in front of the preceding two-lane, from the bank bank room to the bank of spring water children.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving a motor vehicle by taking into account the front side and the left side.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol by negligence in the course of business operated without properly examining the front section, and by the victim E (66 years) who stops in order to have passengers board the right edge of the road in the direction of the running of the Defendant, the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the lower part of the 5 business taxi owned by the sexual taxi owned by the company with limited liability, which was driven by the victim E (66 years).

Ultimately, the Defendant, by the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim E, such as light salt, tensions, etc. requiring a weekly medical treatment, and at the same time, destroyed the damaged vehicle to have an amount equivalent to KRW 450,536, such as the exchange of pan-culs, and escaped without taking measures such as stopping and providing relief to the damaged person.

2. On the same date as paragraph 1, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 0.117% from the 3km section to the parking lot for south-do apartment in the south-do located in 225-8 at the same time, via the same place as Paragraph 1, from the north-do in the north-do in front city to the north-do in the north-do in front city.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;

arrow