Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-U.S. car.

On March 11, 2015, at around 08:43, the Defendant, at around 08:43, is proceeding at a speed of about 60 km per hour in the direction of the instant road along the direction of the instant road. Since traffic control is performed at the time when signal, etc. are installed, the Defendant, who is engaged in driving service, neglected to perform his duty of care to safely drive the vehicle in accordance with the new code, while neglecting the change of the vehicle driving signal to the stop signal, was negligent in driving Mad Victim C (31) driving (the age of 31) driving, which was driven pursuant to the right-hand turn, and was driven by the Defendant’s driving vehicle along the right-hand side of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

The Defendant suffered, due to the above occupational negligence, the victim suffered approximately three months of flag laver laver laver laver laver laver laver, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. C’s statement;

1. The actual survey report and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act [Scope of Recommendation] Article 62-2 of the Order to Attend Education Act: The basic area (in April to October) of the first category of traffic accident (the injury caused by traffic accident) [no special person] [Pronouncement Decision] - The normal circumstances favorable to him/her are contradictory to each other; the first crime; the first crime; the purchase of comprehensive insurance; the unfavorable circumstances; the injury inflicted on the victim; the victim did not agree with the victim