A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of five months.

Punishment of the crime

On March 7, 2011, at the construction company office operated by Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Seoul, the Defendant concluded a contract on behalf of the victim E for the execution of the construction of another canal well-built construction of another canal well-built construction in return for the lending of KRW 30,00,00 to the G located in Gyeonggi-gun, but the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to complete payment of the above borrowed money because the construction permission was not granted for the above canal well-built construction of another canal well-built construction in return for the lending of KRW 30,00,000.

On March 8, 2011, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 5,00,000 from the victim as the borrowed money, i.e., KRW 5,000,000 from the seat, and acquired KRW 25,00,000 from the national bank account under the name of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry of each part of the accused in the suspect examination protocol by the prosecution against the accused, and entry in E;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to accusation, contract, and loan certificate;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. The defendant's reason for sentencing selective punishment of imprisonment with prison labor is denied.

It is good that the crime of this case is led to confession and mistake in this court. However, as if the defendant could contract the construction work, the crime of this case was committed by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim with the name of borrowed money, which is not less than 30 million won, and the case was not less than that of the victim, the victim did not agree with the victim, and the victim want several times of punishment because he did not agree with the victim, and the defendant had several previous tasks.