logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2013.08.23 2012가합6486
임대차보증금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

(a) complete the name of E.

B. On October 31, 2005, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with D on the instant store (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). At the time, the Plaintiff entered into two lease agreements, respectively, as indicated below [Attachment 1].

Among them, the first lease contract (hereinafter referred to as "the first lease contract") in which the deposit is KRW 100 million was prepared at the time of the contract, and the second lease contract (hereinafter referred to as "the second lease contract") in which the deposit is KRW 50 million per month, and the second lease contract in which the deposit is KRW 2 million per month, was prepared thereafter.

The terms of the first lease contract, which is the object of the second lease contract of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, F, approximately 111-2, approximately 10,000,000 won for the lease deposit of about 111-2, approximately 10,000 won for the first floor and about 10,000 won for the lease deposit of about 10,000,000 won for the second lease contract of 2,000 won from October 31, 2005 to October 31, 2010.

1. A provisional attachment of KRW 338 million (creditor G) which has a enormous impediment to business due to the creation of a commercial building (*3 months after the creation of the commercial building, additional deposit of KRW 50 million);

2. The balance of this shall not be settled and monthly rent shall not be paid until the commercial building is formed;

1. Stick hindrances to business as a provisional seizure 3.38 million won (creditor G) building is inside and outside of a commercial building;

2. The balance settlement was known and monthly rent was known until the formation of a commercial building, and the date of October 31, 2005 on which the agreement was made.

From April 20, 2006, the Plaintiff moved into the instant store and started business, and registered two business under the trade name of “H” and “I pharmacy” as the location of the instant store. On January 10, 2007, the Plaintiff obtained the fixed date of each of the above business registration and the first and second lease contracts, respectively. Accordingly, the entry of the report on the fixed date of the instant store in the report on the registration of the fixed date of the instant store is as shown below.

The plaintiff 1.2 is a deposit or monthly rent of the trade name (land size) size on the date on which the date of registration of the name business operator is the fixed date.

arrow