Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant resided in 212 Dong 101, Daegu Northern-gu B building 2, 101, and his wife C leased a childcare center, which is a common facility of the above apartment complex, from November 2004, and operated the "D childcare center".

On October 10, 201, the Defendant refused to renew the lease contract for violating the terms and conditions of the contract in relation to the operation of the above apartment at the council of occupants' representatives (the president and the victim E) and notified the termination of the contract and the intention of ordering it.

At the time of the victim's residence in the Daegu-gu F apartment (Around December 1998), the defendant filed a complaint against and filed a complaint against the existing dong representatives at the time of the victim's death in the Daegu-gu, (Around December 1998), and then concealed the fact that he was his employee belonging to G and replaced the above apartment management company from H to G, and was aware that there was no fact that the fact was discovered and that he was dismissed

Nevertheless, around February 19, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the above Defendant’s office using his/her Nowon Computer, posted one copy of the document that “after having filed a complaint or accusation with the same representative, retired from office; and (b) at that time, F was entrusted management by H; (c) after being elected, he/she concealed that he/she was an employee of G (entrusted management entity) and instigated the representative to be in charge of the audit and inspection; and (d) replaced the controlled entity from H to G. After being discovered that he/she was aware that he/she was receiving the benefits; and (e) was discovered that he/she was aware of the fact that he/she was receiving the benefits; and (e) a person who was inferred from the same representative; and (e) a female member and a female member of the same will be spad and spaded with a flabed, on the Internet homepage (I) free will be freely used by many apartment residents.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1..