The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime.

Other criminal records are not subject to a fine for negligence once for a crime of this paper.

The poor working environment has also become the cause of crime.

The water rate imposed by the defendant due to the defendant's crime exceeds 40 million won.

As a result, the East Sea caused enormous administrative power to be wasted, such as the introduction of human resources, the transfer investigation, and the demand for additional payment or return of the erroneously imposed amount.

In addition, the crime of this case caused serious damage such as decline in administrative confidence.

The Defendant did not take any measure despite the receipt of corrective instructions from the East Sea.

In full view of such circumstances as well as the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the crime, various sentencing conditions as shown in the instant pleadings, such as the circumstances after the crime was committed, it is difficult to view that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.