1. For the plaintiffs:

(a) Defendant D shall provide three real estate of each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. Defendant E shall list attached hereto.

1. The parties' assertion

A. Each real estate listed in the separate list of the plaintiffs (hereinafter "each real estate of this case") was jointly owned by the network I, the network J, the network K, the network L, the network L, and the network M (the above five persons referred to as "the deceased" if they are collectively named). The plaintiffs are co-owners of each real estate of this case as the deceased I, the network L, and the network M, who have succeeded to part of the shares of each real estate of this case as the descendants of the network I, the network L, and the network M, and the defendants are those who possess and use each of the real estate of this case without a legitimate title. The plaintiffs are co-owners of each real estate of this case who possess and use each of the real estate of this case without a legitimate title

(A) The court below held that each of the instant real estate was part of the co-owners of each of the instant real estate, even if each of the instant real estate appears to have been registered as “O type”, and thus, it is still possible to seek exclusion from infringement of title trust property even if each of the instant real estate was registered as “O type” to the deceased. Thus, the Plaintiffs may seek to transfer each of the instant real estate against the Defendants, since it is still possible for them to seek exclusion from infringement of title trust property.

B. Each real estate of this case by the Defendants is the real estate trusted by the non-party clans to the deceased, and the plaintiffs are merely the persons to whom part of the status of the trustee was succeeded.

The lawsuit of this case is unlawful because it concerns each real estate of this case, which is owned by the non-party clan, and is owned by the non-party clan, and is not subject to a resolution of the general members' meeting

Even if the same does not apply, the Defendants were to legally lease and use each of the instant real estate from Nonparty, the title truster, and thus, (the Defendant D does not have occupied and used the instant real estate). Therefore, the Plaintiffs, who were partially succeeded to the status of the title trustee, cannot seek the delivery of each of the instant

2. The case.