1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) who falls under each of the following amounts ordering additional payments.

1. The scope of the judgment of the court of this case is the claim of this case in which the plaintiffs sought compensation for each damage suffered by the defendant due to the accident of this case as seen below, and the defendant is the counterclaim of this case in which the defendant sought return of unjust enrichment corresponding to the amount paid by the defendant to the plaintiffs as medical expenses of the plaintiffs caused by the accident of this case. The court of first instance rendered a judgment of the court of first instance which accepted each part of the plaintiffs' claim of this case and dismissed the remainder of the main claim and the defendant's counterclaim, and only the plaintiffs appealed against the plaintiffs among the part concerning the claim of the main claim of the judgment of the court of first instance, so the scope of the judgment of this court is limited

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

(a)The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings at Gap evidence 1 to 5, 7 to 9, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and Eul evidence 5-2 to 13 or video.

1) The Defendant is Dsi (hereinafter “instant vehicle”)

(2) On March 15, 2014, E is a mutual aid project operator who entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the instant vehicle. (1) around 12:50 on March 15, 2014, E was driving the instant vehicle and driving the instant vehicle along the two lanes between the two lanes from the jurisdiction of the court located at the source of the water sources and the side of the road from the direction of the side of the side of the side of the vehicle, and changing the lane to the side of the side of the vehicle from the side of the side of the side of the vehicle into the side of the side of the instant vehicle. (2) At the time, the Plaintiffs were receiving the part of the G-si (hereinafter “instant vehicle”) in front of the left side of the instant vehicle from the four lanes of the said road (hereinafter “instant accident”), and the Plaintiffs were getting on the top and the rear side of the instant vehicle.

3 On March 18, 2014, Plaintiff A is located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Suwon-si.