logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 2012.04.12 2011고정387
총포ㆍ도검ㆍ화약류등단속법위반 등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 700,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

(a) A person who intends to possess a gun shall obtain permission from the chief of a police station having jurisdiction over his/her domicile, as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry

Nevertheless, at around 09:00 on Nov. 23, 2010, the Defendant did not obtain permission to possess guns, and possessed 1 (1: 102597) a bigtotolua shot gun (1: 102597) owned by Defendant B in a forest where the Gangwon-do Incheon E hunting Prohibited Zone is located.

(b) No one shall carry firearms and live bullets and return to any place other than the hunting ground for the purpose of capturing wild animals;

Nevertheless, the above defendant is the defendant.

at the same time, place, such as subsection (a).

As in the same paragraph, the franchiseer scamba scam with flusium, which is charged with Defendant B, was transported for the purpose of catching wild animals.

2. Defendant B

(a) No person who is permitted to possess a gun shall lend the gun to any third person;

Nevertheless, the defendant above 1-A.

At the same time and place as in paragraph 1, he borrowed it to the defendant A for the reason that he was permitted to possess under section 128 by the chief of the police station of the Republic of Korea.

(b) No one shall carry firearms and live bullets and return to any place other than the hunting ground for the purpose of capturing wild animals;

Nevertheless, the defendant above 1-A.

At the same time and at the same place as the defendant's possession, the defendant was charged with five ball cartridges in the Iseneri, Israela (F074928) Hunshot gun(F074928) and was convened for the purpose of catching wild animals.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A witness G’s legal statement which had undergone a bridge from Defendant B

Part of the statement to the effect that there was no fact that there was a brupt or a brupt, and that Defendant B’s bridge did not have any inconvenience.

1. Of the witness H’s legal statement, the entire statement held by the Defendant A is two.

arrow