1. The defendant's claim against the plaintiff for the purchase price of goods at the Jeonju District Court 201j. 968, Dasan District Court 2011.

1. Basic facts (founded for recognition: Confession);

A. On May 10, 1996, the Defendant filed an application with the Plaintiff for a payment order against the Plaintiff for the payment of the price for goods under the court No. 20159,968, on the ground that the Plaintiff sold the health food as an installment and was not paid the price. This court accepted the Defendant’s application on April 11, 201, and issued a payment order ordering the Plaintiff to pay KRW 1,300,000 and delay damages, which became final and conclusive on May 21, 201.

B. The plaintiff did not purchase the above goods from the defendant, and even if the plaintiff purchased the above goods, three years have already passed since March 10, 1997, which was the final due date for payment of the above goods against the plaintiff.

2. According to the above facts, even if the defendant's claim for the price of goods against the plaintiff was not likely to occur, and even if it is not a domestic affairs, it shall be deemed that the extinctive prescription has expired after the lapse of three years from the final due date prior to the application for the above payment order, since it is apparent that it

3. If so, the above payment order is concluded, since there is no claim against the plaintiff against the plaintiff, or since it was issued after the prescription expires, the plaintiff's claim of this case seeking the exclusion of executive force is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.