1. The Defendant’s KRW 65,137,506 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from September 22, 2017 to March 14, 2019, and the following.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) The Plaintiff is a person who operated the instant business office of the D&D agency for medical device distributors in Daegu North-gu, Daegu-gu (hereinafter “instant agency”).

(2) The Defendant is a company that sells household appliances.

B. (1) The Plaintiff used electrical electrical products (DH Q-758S, hereinafter “instant product”) sold by the Defendant at the instant business office.

On October 11, 2016, between the Plaintiff and all employees, around 04:48, 2016, it was difficult to find out inside the place of business of this case due to excessive heat lines between the Plaintiff and all employees.

(2) The damages suffered by the Plaintiff due to a fire were assessed as totaling KRW 65,137,506 (i.e., the total value of the facility value of KRW 10,179,888 for the total value of KRW 38,647,218 for the inventory value of KRW 7410,000 for the total cost of removal of KRW 7,410,000 for the inventory value of KRW

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 4, Gap evidence 9-1 through 3, Gap evidence 15-1 through 6, E witness E, F testimony, appraiser G’s appraisal result, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. The defendant is a manufacturer (Article 2 subparagraph 3 of the Product Liability Act), and is liable to compensate for property damage to a person who suffered property damage due to a defect of a product.

(Article 3(1) of the Product Liability Act. According to the facts recognized above, the Plaintiff may recognize the fact that the fire caused by the defect of the instant product was damaged by KRW 65,137,506.

[Plaintiff’s assertion that since the signboards and hostings installed in the instant business office were not able to be used, the total amount of the installation cost should be recognized as damages. However, in light of the fact that the appraisal did not judge the damage, it is insufficient to recognize only the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff], the Defendant asserts that the Plaintiff should consider the situation that the Plaintiff retired should be considered in calculating damages with connecting the instant product to all sources.

However, the organizations using the foregoing shall be.