The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The lower court’s sentence (six months of imprisonment and two years of suspended execution) is deemed to be too unhued and unfair.

2. Determination is an unfavorable circumstance to the Defendant that the Defendant had a record of being subject to juvenile protective disposition once he/she committed the same crime, that the Defendant did not agree with the victim E, and that the Defendant did not receive a letter from the above victim.

On the other hand, the following points are favorable to the defendant.

The Defendant led to the confession of each of the facts charged in the instant case and divided his mistake.

The Defendant agreed with the victim G only with the victim, and received a letter of tolerance from the above victim.

The defendant's workplace fees want the defendant's wife against the defendant.

The degree of damage caused by each of the instant crimes is relatively weak.

The Defendant has yet to live in good faith in the young and future.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, sex, environment, relationship with the victim, etc. of the defendant, the sentence of the court below is not deemed unfair because it is too low.

Therefore, prosecutor's assertion is without merit.

3. The appeal by the prosecutor of the conclusion is without merit and is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.