logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.11.19 2015고단770
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that the Defendant’s employee did not comply with the direction of the inspector at around December 6, 1994 when driving the B truck on December 6, 1994 with respect to the Defendant’s business.

2. Determination

A. The prosecutor prosecuted the above charged facts by applying Article 86 and Article 84 subparagraph 1 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 1993; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 4920, Jun. 1, 1993).

B. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545, Mar. 10, 193; Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 4920, Jun. 1, 1993); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920, Jan. 5, 1995; Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005); Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832, Dec. 30, 2005; Amended by Act No. 8976, Mar. 21, 2008; Act No. 8314, Apr. 19, 2005; Act No. 8675, Apr. 19, 2005; Act No. 8677, Mar. 19, 2008)

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow