A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 30, 2018, around 13:40 on April 30, 2018, the Defendant received a civil petition that the Defendant installed a sorash and sold an excessive work in India, and when the victim D, who was a public official of the Seocho-gu Office C, to arrive at the site, called “Arash and a task installed in India to the Defendant,” D means “I am Hahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhn

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the public officials of the Seocho-gu Office in order to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties regarding the civil petition affairs of public officials, and at the same time, inflicted injury on the victim D such as chins, tensions, etc. requiring treatment for about 14 days, and inflicted injury on the victim E such as chins, tensions, etc. requiring treatment for about 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D, E, and F;

1. On-site photographs, victim photographs, and control site photographs;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for counseling on civil petitions through the electronic civil petition counter;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. In light of the fact that the Defendant, for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, committed the instant crime in spite of the same criminal record, and did not agree with the victims, it is necessary to strictly punish the Defendant.

However, the fact that the defendant does not commit a second offense while recognizing his mistake, it is a contingent crime, and the defendant's economic situation is not good.