logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.11.30 2016가단804950
대여금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B’s KRW 30,000,000 and for this, KRW 5% per annum from April 26, 2017 to November 30, 2017.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(b) Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act of the applicable provisions of Acts (a judgment of deemed as a confession due to a absence of the defendant);

2. The facts stated in the attached Form of the judgment on the claim against Defendant C do not conflict between the parties, and the defendant is ordered to make a decision on the claim against the plaintiff.

have an obligation to pay the money stated in the subsection.

As to this, the Defendant asserts to the effect that, at the request of the Plaintiff, the site manager of the Jeju Construction Corporation, from April 2015 to June 201 of the same year, the painting Construction Corporation and the additional construction were not paid totaling KRW 47,00,000. The Defendant did not appear at the site at the time of the settlement of construction cost, and the Plaintiff did not receive only KRW 13,000,000 from the Jeju Construction Corporation around February 2016, and submitted a written waiver and submitted it to the effect that the Plaintiff sustained KRW 34,00,000.

However, there is no evidence to acknowledge the defendant's above assertion, and the defendant's above assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow