logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원서부지원 2014.12.17 2014가단17989
퇴직금
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 24, 200, Plaintiff A entered the Defendant Company as an employee of the employment contract and worked as a debt collector of the business management team on the ground that the result of collection was poor, after the settlement of retirement allowances from July 24, 200 to July 23, 2001, converted the period of the contract into the delegated contract debt collector from July 24, 2001 to the delegated contract debt collector, setting the period of the contract on a six-month basis, and renewed the delegation contract until July 31, 201.

B. On April 1, 2005, Plaintiff B joined the Defendant Company as a delegation contract officer, set the contract term on a six-month basis as a short-term business team debt collector, and worked until July 28, 201 when renewal of the delegation contract. On July 28, 201, Plaintiff B notified the Defendant of the termination of the delegation contract and the termination of the delegation contract was terminated.

C. On January 31, 201, the Defendant Company drafted a delegation contract with the Plaintiff Company A, and the details thereof are as follows.

(1)The claims collection service and any post-management service incidental thereto, credit investigation, property investigation and any post-management service incidental thereto, and any other service related thereto, and any other service specially delegated, shall be performed in good faith.

(2) The term of a contract under Article 4 (Period) is from February 1, 2011 to July 31, 201.

(3) A mandatory under Article 5 (Qualification Requirements, Education, etc.) shall not have the grounds for disqualification as a delegated claims collector.

(4) The right to allocate and collect claims under section 7 (Notice of Quantity Allocation and Acceptance of Claims) is wholly against the defendant company, and the mandatary may not raise an objection in any case.

(5) Article 9 (Investigation of Status of Handling) If deemed necessary, the defendant company may require the mandatary to investigate and report on the status of the entrusted affairs, and the mandatary shall comply therewith.

(6) Article 10 (Fees) The Defendant Company shall pay the fees separately determined, and even during the term of the contract, the quantity and scale of the delegated work, the recovery of claims by the mandatory, and the type of claims.

arrow