logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.10.20 2016고단1844
특수공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 2, 2011, the Defendant was issued a summary order of 2.5 million won by the Seoul Western District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving). In addition, the same kind of power is more than three times.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On April 23, 2016, at around 22:30, the Defendant driven a eba car under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of about 4.5 km from the section of approximately 4.5 km to the front road of "Dai Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li Li

2. Special obstruction of performance of official duties and damage to public goods were driven by the police officers belonging to the Pakistan Police Station while driving the said soba vehicle on the front of the foregoing D, and the police officers under the influence of alcohol driving force were likely to be subject to heavy punishment due to the previous alcohol driving force, and the Defendant escaped to the opposite direction by going beyond the central line.

Accordingly, F, who was under the control of drinking, was driving a patrol vehicle of No. 3, thereby driving the Defendant. Then, G, who was under the jurisdiction of the police station, led to driving away from the Defendant, while G, who was under the jurisdiction of the police station, led to driving away from the Defendant. The Defendant invaded the central line over several occasions, went through an illegal internship, and continued escape.

The Defendant came to a long-distance in the Sari-gu, Sari-gu, Sari-gu, Sari-si, and the above net 2 set up a patrol vehicle with the rear 2nd of the above net 12,600 won, which is an object dangerous to prevent the Defendant from driving ahead of the Defendant’s car, and went back to the road in front of the above “Sari-gu,” which is the back 12,600 won.

Accordingly, the defendant carries dangerous articles and is justified in regulating the drinking driving of police officers, preventing traffic hazards, and suppressing crimes.

arrow