Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 15,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 24, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Military Service Act at the branch court of Suwon District Court for a violation of the said Act, and on August 9, 2009, on August 20, 2009, sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the said Act, from the Suwon District Court’s Pyeongtaek District Court’s Pyeongtaek District Court’s official conflict, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive, and the said suspended sentence was invalidated on September 30, 2010 during the execution of the said sentence, and the remaining term of imprisonment has expired on October 11, 2010.

1. On August 201, 201, the Defendant concluded that “When investing 30 million won in operating a 129 emergency squad as a partner, the Defendant would operate a first-aid unit by preparing a first-aid vehicle if it invests 30 million won in operating the 129 emergency squad as a partner, the Defendant would operate the first-aid unit.”

However, the defendant did not have certain income at the time, and even if he did not receive investment funds from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to operate the 129 emergency squad.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, received from the victim a total amount of KRW 30 million on August 27, 201, 201, 14.4 million on October 14, 201, 201, 26.5 million on October 26, 201, 6 million won on November 8, 201, and 5 million won on November 9, 201, respectively.

2. The Defendant, on the Internet hosting, told the victim C, who had been in a dynamic relationship with the Internet, that “it operates five hospitals, and owns the shares of the G Foundation in the Fa Hospital Medical Corporation. It is also owned by the land, such as racing H.).” The Defendant, by citing that he/she had an excessive re-performance, had expressed his/her own re-performance, and had the victim, who believed his/her re-performance as a fact of borrowing money, acquired money from the victim as a

However, the facts were that the father of the defendant did not operate the hospital, and the defendant did not own shares in the G Foundation's corporation or the land in the racing market, and the defendant was at the time.