A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Seized evidence 2 or 3 shall be confiscated.

Punishment of the crime

On July 21, 2005, the defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1 million from Suwon District Prosecutors' Office to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, to transfer juvenile protection cases to the same public prosecutor's office on August 5, 2005, to transfer the juvenile protection cases to the same public prosecutor's office on March 30, 2006, to transfer the juvenile protection cases to the same public prosecutor's office on April 19, 2007, to transfer the juvenile protection cases to the special larceny in the same public prosecutor's office on November 7, 2007, to Daejeon District Public Prosecutor's Office on February 1, 2013, to receive a summary order of KRW 1,00,000 from Suwon District Public Prosecutor's Branch branch on April 10, 2014, to the same court on April 10, 2018.

On June 13, 2014, at around 10:25, the Defendant entered the church, through the entrance door opened in Da, which was located in Maan-gu, Manan-gu, Manan-gu, Manan-gu, the Defendant: (a) examined the inside of the money managed by the victim E, who had been in the second floor of the above church, but did not make a theft because of the lack of money; (b) again, at around 22:20 on the same day, infringed upon the third floor office of the above church by the same method, and cut off one of the three floors North Korean defectors, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 800,000,000, which was located therein.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen another person's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Each protocol of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A investigative report (CCTV analysis);

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records and investigation reports (Attachment of previous convictions and a copy of the judgment);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the fact that the same crime has been repeated several times in a short period;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;