1. The Defendant is on the ground of an agreement on transfer on September 26, 201 with respect to one-fourths of the 136463 square meters of forest C in racing to the Plaintiff.

1. The facts following the facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties or may be found in full view of the respective entries in Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (including paper numbers) and the whole purport of the pleadings, or are significant in this Court.

On March 16, 1995, the registration of ownership transfer was completed on March 16, 1995 with respect to C forest land of 136463 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

B. On January 29, 1970, E sought the procedure for the cancellation of ownership transfer registration of the instant land against D, and filed a lawsuit against D on January 29, 1970 to seek implementation of the procedure for ownership transfer registration based on the transfer agreement (Tgu District Court racing-Support 2009Gadan4711), and the said court rendered a judgment dismissing all the claims of E on January 18, 201.

C. E appealed against the above judgment, and the appellate court dismissed the appeal against E on August 26, 201, and the appellate court rendered a judgment ordering E to comply with the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer of the instant land, citing the appeal against both school foundations and South Korean Institute of Education.

(T) The Daegu District Court 201Na4139) filed an appeal against E with the Supreme Court against this decision, and the case was pending in the Supreme Court.

(Supreme Court Decision 2011Da77702). D.

On September 26, 2011, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the Defendant, a legal entity, which is an agent for the son of E, to delegate the litigation affairs to the Supreme Court of Korea (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

In the instant agreement, E paid KRW 4,400,00 to the Plaintiff as the retainer fee, and the performance fee agreed to transfer the ownership of KRW 1/4 of the instant land when the judgment of reversal and return is rendered.

E. In accordance with the instant agreement, the Plaintiff performed the litigation agency work for the Supreme Court 201Da77702 case. In the instant case, the Supreme Court reversed the lower judgment on January 12, 2012, and remanded the case to the Daegu District Court Panel Division.