All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (3 million won) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence declared by the prosecutor by the court below is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The Defendant’s act of lending an access medium, such as the instant crime, is an act that facilitates various criminal acts, such as a single-scaming, and there is a need to strictly punish and eradicate it, and the fact that the access medium leased by the Defendant was actually used for the criminal act of licensing, etc. is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant has no criminal record except for a punishment imposed once as a fine for a crime of dual punishment, and that he recognizes the crime of this case and reflects his mistake is favorable to the defendant.

In addition, there is no special circumstance or change of circumstances that can be newly considered after the pronouncement of the judgment below, and considering the records of this case and all of the sentencing conditions mentioned in the previous theory, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, it does not seem that the punishment imposed by the court below is too heavy or too heavy and unfair.

Therefore, each of the above arguments by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since all of the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.