logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 안동지원 2017.03.21 2016고단962
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant A was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Daegu District Court on November 12, 2015, and completed the execution of the said sentence at the Busan Correctional Institution on August 1, 2016.

[Criminal facts] The Defendants are not narcotics handlers.

1. On December 10, 2016, the Defendants conspiredd to purchase and divide Metetop clop (one philopon; hereinafter “philopon”) which is a mental medicine for light-wise mental health on the part of the Defendants.

Accordingly, Defendant A purchased 200,000 won from G (sexual insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular insular.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to purchase philophones from G.

2. On December 10, 2016, Defendant B, who was parked in the L parking lot located in Ansan-si, Dong-si, Dong-dong (hereinafter “Defendant B”) in a single-use injection vehicle with a philop 0.03gopon purchased as prescribed in paragraph 1, and dilution it, and then administered it by means of injection into the left part.

3. On December 13, 2016, Defendant A administered 0.03g of philopon 0.03g, purchased at the Defendant’s inside the Defendant’s residence located in Ansan-si M, in a way of drinking in the water of Ka Car Lease, as set forth in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of the Defendants to the prosecution

1. Police seizure records;

1. Each response to a request for appraisal;

1. Investigation report (written reply to price response to philophones);

1. Previous conviction: Application of a written reply to inquiry, such as criminal history (A) and Acts and subordinate statutes on personal expropriation;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow