Text
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 62 million with 15% per annum from March 18, 2016 to the day of complete payment.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a company that conducts mobile content development business, and the Defendant is a company that conducts curriculum development business, etc.
B. On November 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a service contract with the Defendant requesting the Plaintiff to provide Lmms development services.
The contract period shall be from the contract date to the contract contents, and the service price shall be KRW 35 million, and the contract price shall be KRW 15 million within five business days after the contract is concluded, and the remainder KRW 20 million shall be paid within five business days after the examination is completed.
On November 20, 2014, the Plaintiff received KRW 15 million from the Defendant.
C. On January 5, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded a service contract with the Defendant requesting the Plaintiff to produce e-learning education content, and the service price was set at KRW 100 million.
The Plaintiff received KRW 8 million from the Defendant around November 20, 2014, and KRW 50 million around January 5, 2015.
[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to Gap evidence 4, Eul evidence 2, whole purport of oral argument
2. Assertion and determination
A. According to the reasoning of Gap evidence Nos. 5 and Gap evidence Nos. 6 and the whole purport of the pleadings, it is recognized that the plaintiff had established a related system on the defendant's website by performing duties in accordance with the above LMS development service contract and content production service contract, and that "Internet remote training courses" produced under the content development service contract was appropriate for five contents from the Korea Technology Education University Tele-Training Review Center, which is a content review agency.
According to the above facts, the Plaintiff is deemed to have fulfilled all the obligations under the above Lmms Development and Content Production Services Contract. Thus, the Defendant is deemed to have fulfilled all the obligations on the part of the Plaintiff. As such, the Defendant is from March 18, 2016, which is the day following the delivery date of the instant payment order, including the remainder of 20 million won for Lmms Development Services and the remainder of 42 million won for content production services, and the Plaintiff’s total of 62 million won including the remainder of 42 million won for content production services.