logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.08 2016가합513413
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's 168,00,000 won for plaintiff A, 175,00,000 won for plaintiff B, and 169,000,000 won for plaintiff C and each of the above amounts.

Reasons

1) On July 1, 2011, Plaintiff A entered into a contract for fact-finding (hereinafter “instant building”) with the Gwanak-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City E, F, and G-based building (hereinafter “instant building”).

(2) On January 4, 2007, Plaintiff B entered into a lease agreement with H on January 18, 2014, with the term of lease from January 30, 2014 to January 29, 2016, setting a deposit of KRW 140 million, monthly rent of KRW 600,000,000, and operated a sales business, such as telecommunications equipment. (2) On January 4, 2007, Plaintiff B entered into a lease agreement with H on February 5, 2014, and renewed the lease agreement again from February 5, 2014 to February 4, 2016.

3) On February 11, 2014, Plaintiff C entered into a lease agreement with H and the first floor of the instant building from February 10, 2014 to February 9, 2016, setting the lease term as KRW 120 million, KRW 120 million, KRW 5.8 million per month, and the sales business of clothing, etc. in the instant commercial building. On January 16, 2015, the Defendant purchased the instant building from H and I, which are co-owners, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on March 16, 2015. The Defendant rejected the Plaintiff A and B’s request for renewal of the lease agreement on December 14, 2015, on condition that deposit is KRW 20 million, KRW 160,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, respectively, to the Plaintiff C.

2 Plaintiff A and B requested each Defendant to renew the contract under the same conditions as the present lease on or around December 28, 2015, and Plaintiff C around January 7, 2016, and requested each Defendant to conclude a lease contract with a new lessee arranged by the Plaintiffs for the collection of the premium if the Defendant refuses to do so.

The plaintiffs.

arrow