logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.05.21 2014고정398
업무상과실장물취득
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a “D new settlement store” computer in Young-gu, Young-si C.

The defendant, who is engaged in the business of buying and selling heavy computers, has a duty of care to verify whether the seller's personal information is verified and entered in the book, and whether the seller requires the details of the acquisition of goods, the motive of the sale, and the price at the time of transaction.

1. On September 30, 2013, at the above office around 17:30 on September 30, 2013, the Defendant purchased one Samsung E’s own market value equivalent to KRW 1,000,000, which was the victim F that he stolen from E, and acquired the stolen article by purchasing the one of the two North Koreas, which was negligent in neglecting the duty of care as above and neglecting the judgment on the stolen property, by purchasing the stolen article at KRW 90,00,000, while neglecting the duty

2. At around 16:00 on October 17, 2013, the Defendant purchased one of the victim G North Korea 1,200, the market price of which he stolen from E, and acquired the stolen goods by purchasing KRW 80,000 by negligence, which neglected the above duty of care and neglected the determination on the stolen goods.

3. At around 11:30 on October 19, 2013, the Defendant purchased one computer body equivalent to KRW 300,000 at the market price of the victim H, which he stolen from E, and acquired the stolen body by purchasing the above computer body at KRW 100,000 by negligence, failing to perform the above duty of care and neglecting to make a judgment on the stolen.

4. On October 23, 2013, at the above office around 14:00, the Defendant purchased one Samsungbuk-North Korea equivalent to KRW 600,000 at the market price of the victim I who was stolen by the Defendant, and acquired the above Nompt North Korea by purchasing 280,000 by negligence, neglecting the duty of care as above and neglecting the determination on the stolen.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1.F, I, G, and H.

arrow