logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.18 2016고합511
자살방조미수
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

C around March 30, 2016, Internet NVber “D” came to know E (n, 28 years of age) and around April 3, 2016, the social network website “twitter.com” came to know of F.

C and F, around April 4, 2016, around 194, as a new distribution in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, met E from the bus terminal in Seocho-gu, Seoul, and was accommodated in the Hemotour in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and tried to commit suicide by purchasing bomtans and flowers, and tried to commit suicide again.

On the other hand, around April 5, 2016, the Defendant reported and contacted the accompanying suicide posted by E at the Twitter site, and the Defendant prepared to live together with C, F, E, and the accompanying person.

As a result, C, F, the Defendant, the Defendant, and E were prepared to be exempted from the water, and D, around 19:30 on April 5, 2016, 301 and 307 of the “Jmotour” in the same Gu, which is located in the Newcom Line No. 7 of the subway Line No. 19:30 on April 5, 2016.

The defendant, C, F, and E provide meals in the vicinity of the above telecom, drink the alcohol, and block all the windows with tapes prepared in advance and return to the telecom at around 23:50 on the same day.

E, after taking out the water exemption prepared by E, attempted suicide due to the addiction of the U.S. carbon with a shot and a shot, but the fire alarm device installed in the telecom did not reach the wind death reported to the police by the owner of the business.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with C, F, and E, attempted to assist the other party to commit suicide, but failed to commit it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. An interrogation protocol of F by prosecution;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding C;

1. The police statement of K;

1. A written statement prepared L;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each field photograph (No. 2 and 6 of the evidence list), field identification reports (No. 5 of the evidence list), and the twitter of suspect F (Evidence No. 8 of the evidence list);

1. Each relevant Article of the Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow