1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of evidence No. 1 in the statement as to the facts based on Gap evidence, it is recognized that the defendant filed an application for compulsory execution against Eul, etc. based on the executory exemplification of the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2013Da55685, which the defendant filed against Eul, etc., and that the execution officer entrusted by the defendant, who belongs to this court, filed an application for compulsory execution on March 10, 2016, carried out the seizure of corporeal movables.

2. The plaintiff asserted that the article of this case is the plaintiff, and therefore, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving that the article of this case is owned by the plaintiff, i.e., the grounds for objection in the lawsuit of demurrer against the third party, i.e. the plaintiff, and there is no evidence to acknowledge that the plaintiff has the right to prevent the transfer or delivery of the article of this case. Thus, the plaintiff's above assertion is rejected.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.