1. The defendant collects building stones and arms on the ground of each real estate listed in the separate sheet 1 to 4 from the plaintiffs, and collects them.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 8, 2017, the Plaintiffs: (a) leased to the Defendant each of the real estate listed in paragraphs 1 through 6 of the attached Table 1 and the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 List 7, with the lease deposit of KRW 30 million (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) and the lease of KRW 98 square meters (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”) in the order of priority among the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 List 1 List 7; and (b) leased each of the said real estate to the Plaintiffs as the lease deposit of KRW 30 million; (c) from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2019; and (d) KRW 300,000 per month (hereinafter “instant lease contract”); and (d) around that time, the Defendant paid each of the said real estate to the Plaintiffs KRW 300,000,000 on May 8, 2017; and (e) the Defendant paid the said lease deposit of KRW 3001,371.7.7 million.

On the other hand, in the instant lease contract, the lessor can terminate the said lease contract if the lessee fails to pay more than three rents.

B. After the lease contract of this case, the Defendant has installed stone and arms on the ground of each real estate listed in attached Tables 1 through 4 among each real estate of this case.

C. On March 2019, the Defendant delayed payment of the rent under the instant lease agreement, and the amount exceeded the rent for three months, and the Plaintiffs expressed their intent to terminate the instant lease agreement on the grounds of the delinquency in payment of rent for at least three years against the Defendant by serving a duplicate of the instant complaint. The said duplicate was served on the Defendant on March 24, 2019.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry and video of Gap evidence 1 to 4 (including branch numbers in case of additional number) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. We examine the judgment on the cause of the claim. Since the lease contract of this case was terminated by the plaintiffs' declaration of termination on the grounds of the defendant's delinquency in rent, the defendant is obligated to deliver each of the real estate of this case to the plaintiffs, and the restoration of the original state to the original state, each of the real estate's ground stones listed in [Attachment 1] 1-