1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff (appointed party), KRW 26,900,254, KRW 8,433,853, and KRW 10,121,607 to the appointed party D.

The defendant is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing acrylic products in Namyang-si, Namyang-si, and the plaintiffs are the workers employed by the defendant to engage in the acrylic processing and retired on June 30, 2015.

【The Plaintiffs asserted by the parties without dispute as to the grounds for recognition】 The Plaintiffs asserted by the parties, from November 1, 1995, from February 5, 2001, from February 5, 2001, and from April 5, 2000, from June 30, 2015, Plaintiff A employed the Defendant to work until June 30, 2015 without interruption of the working period. The Defendant recognized Plaintiff A as continuing to work for the period from August 1, 2005 to June 30, 2015, respectively, and paid Plaintiff C and D retirement pay for the period from June 2, 2005 to June 30, 2015.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay the amount stated in the "retirement Allowance" as stated below to the plaintiffs and the delay damages therefor.

On November 1 through July 31, 2015, A (3560 days) 101,960 won 101,960 won x 30 days x 350 days x C 29,83,755 days x 79,143 won x 79,143 won x 365 days x 15 days x 365 days x 206 days x 365 days x 365 days x 365 days x 365 days x 10,250 days d 65. 65 days d 205. 5 days 65 days x 205 days x 360 days x 208 days x 27. 15 days x 206 days x 27. 8. 27. 25 days x 15 days x 7. 28 days 20

On November 29, 2004, the Defendant paid retirement allowances for the period up to the retirement of the Plaintiffs as an annual salary system, and even if the Plaintiffs did not pay household duties, the extinctive prescription period of three years from November 29, 2004 has expired, and thus, the Plaintiffs’ claim for retirement allowances is without merit.