beta
Text
[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for five months.
However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] Defendant A was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for fraud at the Busan District Court on May 10, 2017, and the above judgment was finalized on August 26, 2017.
The Defendants, “2017 Highest 6324, the 2017 Highest 6324,” made the victims obtain a loan from a savings bank by using the fact that the procedure for the identification of the principal is simple and inadequate when the loans are received from the savings bank, and conspired to play a role in inducing the victims by making an agreement and a fair deed when they receive a claim for non-payment of the money. When they lend the loan to the Defendant A, as if they would pay a high amount of fee and make repayment of the principal in the short term, they would be pretend to receive the above loan from the victims as if they would pay a high amount of fee. Defendant A would act as a business entity; Defendant B would induce the victims while inducing the victims; and Defendant B would induce the victims to introduce another victims; and
Defendant
B In accordance with the above public offering, on November 2016, 2016, from the Seocho-gu training-gu Busan Metropolitan Government, 229 to the victim I, the motive of the university, "a loan to A in lieu of interest, a fee of KRW 1,00,000,000, the principal shall be paid in full after three months.
Na Do also has received interest and fees from A by lending KRW 30 million to A.
We also proposed that "I d.", around November 22, 2016, I moved the victim to the office located in the same J of the Gu.
Defendant
A In the above office, “A shall pay the interest and fees to the victim who is a bank traded by us, with the loan received from the bank, and shall pay the principal within three months after paying the money with the business.
“.......”
However, Defendant A did not have any intent or ability to repay the loan within the period of promise, even if the injured party borrowed the loan because there is no plan or actual profit to promote the business.