Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (six months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.
2. Where there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the first instance court, and the sentencing of the first instance court does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect such a case (see Supreme Court Decision 2015Do3260, Jul. 23, 2015). The lower court, as indicated in its reasoning, determined the Defendant’s punishment by comprehensively taking into account the favorable circumstances and unfavorable circumstances for the Defendant.
In light of the plannedness of the instant crime committed against women and the interview and interview of the law applicable to them, the circumstances alleged by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal are deemed to have already been taken into account in the sentencing process of the lower court. It is difficult to view that deposit KRW 500,000 to victims D in the first instance trial as a new change in circumstances to change the sentence of the lower court.
When comprehensively considering the conditions of sentencing, such as the character, conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. as shown in the deliberation and arguments of the court below and the party concerned, and the scope of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing guidelines, the sentence of the court below cannot be deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion or to be unfair because it is too large.
3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.